LudicrousSpeedGO!
Active member
I don't have a predetermined answer. That is why I say it warrants further scientific study. Good lord, you guys are insufferable. How exactly do you know 1) that I have a predetermined answer and 2) what that answer is? It's not like I'm a climate scientist looking for government funding and engineering my model to their desired solution. I have proposed a viable mechanism and stated that it warrants further scientific study.Continuing to ask a question because you want a predetermined answer that doesn't match all the answers you've already gotten isn't the mentality of a scientist
You have not discussed the science at all. You posted a tweet from a meteorologist with glaring logic errors. You are not critically thinking. Why don't you actually discuss the science here? Go ahead. Let's hear your reasons for not wanting further scientific study.
BTW, 99% of scientists thought that Newtonian physics explained our entire world until Einstein showed us that it no longer applied to objects moving at very high speeds and Planck showed us that it didn't apply to the smallest known particles. Without this understanding today you wouldn't have GPS, lasers, MRI scanners, and radar guns.
Last edited: