Dershowitz states that there is an Epstein list and he has seen it. Not good at all for the attorney general or the FBI director. Or Alina Habbaba.


Dershowitz says he has seen the list, knows why certain people are being protected, but can't release the information, because of attorney client confidentiality. This is not good at all. Dershowitz has generally been very credible with his factual allegations, although his policy positions are often quite biased.

Two Theories
1. Trump is on it and his DOJ is covering it up. This is unlikely b/c the Biden admin had the files and would have surely leaked it during the campaign.
2. As many smarter than I have previously surmised, Epstein, a financier with no known financial transactions, was an Intel operation, either US or Israeli and so it can't/won't be released. Much like COVlD coming from a lab in the city it originated, this is the most likely explanation.
 
Two Theories
1. Trump is on it and his DOJ is covering it up. This is unlikely b/c the Biden admin had the files and would have surely leaked it during the campaign.
2. As many smarter than I have previously surmised, Epstein, a financier with no known financial transactions, was an Intel operation, either US or Israeli and so it can't/won't be released. Much like COVlD coming from a lab in the city it originated, this is the most likely explanation.
Agreed. An IC operation with some big fish caught up in it. Trump needs to get things done, so he's got to play the game.
 
Agreed. An IC operation with some big fish caught up in it. Trump needs to get things done, so he's got to play the game.
I agree with your thoughts. However, you would think that Biondi, Patel & Alina Hababba would be in on what is going on and would have kept quiet. Habbaba in particular was very specific in saying that those responsible for abuse of the children had to be held accountable. If that is the case, she has to be held accountable for putting her foot in her mouth.
 
Two Theories
1. Trump is on it and his DOJ is covering it up. This is unlikely b/c the Biden admin had the files and would have surely leaked it during the campaign.
2. As many smarter than I have previously surmised, Epstein, a financier with no known financial transactions, was an Intel operation, either US or Israeli and so it can't/won't be released. Much like COVlD coming from a lab in the city it originated, this is the most likely explanation.
And, once again, the laugh emoji. Right on cue.
 

Dershowitz says he has seen the list, knows why certain people are being protected, but can't release the information, because of attorney client confidentiality. This is not good at all. Dershowitz has generally been very credible with his factual allegations, although his policy positions are often quite biased.
He didn't say that he's seen "the list". He said that documents were being suppressed to protect businessmen, politicians, and false accusers.
 

Dershowitz says he has seen the list, knows why certain people are being protected, but can't release the information, because of attorney client confidentiality. This is not good at all. Dershowitz has generally been very credible with his factual allegations, although his policy positions are often quite biased.

Buck, I think conservatives have invested way too much emotional energy in this mythical (or not) Epstein "list."

Twitter is ablaze with demands that Bondi resign...with assertions that Patel and Bongino have sold out. It's bordering on hysteria.

To be clear, I don't really believe the official story either. I think the claim that Epstein killed himself is pure gaslighting. But we've got much bigger fish to fry than Epstein...and not a whole lot of time to do it.

As for Dershowitz, I don't know, color me skeptical. The idea that he would make such a grandiose statement and then promptly hide behind attorney-client privilege strikes me as pretty lame.
 
He didn't say that he's seen "the list". He said that documents were being suppressed to protect businessmen, politicians, and false accusers.
I think you are splitting hairs here. At the very beginning he States " I have seen" and then gets distracted. He follows that by stating multiple times that there are documents with the names of people associated with Epstein and they are being suppressed.
 
Buck, I think conservatives have invested way too much emotional energy in this mythical (or not) Epstein "list."
It really isn't that important of an issue for me. With the wars going on in Ukraine and Israel I think those are much more important. However, i know this is very important to a lot of people (including an ex-prosecutor friend of mine) and so I think it needs to be dealt with.
As for Dershowitz, I don't know, color me skeptical. The idea that he would make such a grandiose statement and then promptly hide behind attorney-client privilege
This has been a big issue for Dershowitz for a long time --something like 10 years. He has consistently been calling for the release of the records because he was falsely accused by someone connected with the Epstein activities. He is in a position to know and has been a credible person with respect to factual allegations for a long time on a lot of different issues.
 
For years, Trump supporters used the list as an excuse to attack anyone and everyone they didn't like. To score cheap political points based off absolutely nothing except wild unsupported allegations. They held everyone's feet to the fire ... "Release the list! We know why you're not releasing the list! All these Dems would be implicated!" And so on. It just kept going. They had convinced everyone this was a real point and a real problem, and the Dems were all bad people because of this.

Now, Trump's folks promise us the files, and the list. Then they mysteriously say there is no list. Basically nothing is released, so the administration has been proven to have lied through its teeth. And then someone comes out to contradict the Trump administration and say they know there's a list, and Trump supporters believe him.

But they're STILL trying to hold Trump as chaste and forthright in this whole thing.

I mean, Trump's scum ... we all know this. Even if you're willing to overlook his awfulness because you're looking for an advantageous political situation, no one with the least bit of morality would let him near their daughter. The guy bragged about sexual assault (including teenage girls), barging in on them while they're naked and laughing that they couldn't do anything to stop him. He talked openly about finding his own daughter sexually attractive and wanting to get with her. He's been found liable in a court of law for sexual assault. He committed a felony (related to getting elected) in order to try to cover up that he raw-dogged some ho while his 3rd baby mama was pregnant. He hung out with, and partied with, Epstein, and Epstein & Co. even used his property to recruit underage sex workers. Epstein even died in prison while Trump was in charge of them.

All this, and they're still looking for "outs" for the "man."
 
Buck, I think conservatives have invested way too much emotional energy in this mythical (or not) Epstein "list."

Twitter is ablaze with demands that Bondi resign...with assertions that Patel and Bongino have sold out. It's bordering on hysteria.

To be clear, I don't really believe the official story either. I think the claim that Epstein killed himself is pure gaslighting. But we've got much bigger fish to fry than Epstein...and not a whole lot of time to do it.

As for Dershowitz, I don't know, color me skeptical. The idea that he would make such a grandiose statement and then promptly hide behind attorney-client privilege strikes me as pretty lame.
At first glance I would agree there are bigger fish to fry but the reason there are bigger things to deal with is b/c our Congress/Judiciary/Executive are beyond compromised and have clearly been working for entities other than the American people for decades now.

One of the main reasons for this are the blackmail operations (epstein was just one of many) targeting big players in all 3 branches of govt at all levels as well as big players in the private sector (Gates, Stephen Hawking, Celebs, royalty, etc.) for many decades. Once the epstein thread gets pulled it could potentially collapse entire sections of our govt (imagine if like 1/3 of all Senators were involved). I don't think it's hyperbolic at all to say the list of people caught up in the epstein honeypot/web could be considered a threat to national security. God only know how many Senators, Judges, et al were caught up in this.

Pulling on the thread will also clearly expose that epstein was a joint cia/mossad operation which points back to Israel and thanks to AIPAC most people in DC don't want to go down that road.

IMG_3781.jpeg
 
Last edited:
At first glance I would agree there are bigger fish to fry but the reason there are bigger things to deal with is b/c our Congress/Judiciary/Executive are beyond compromised and have clearly been working for entities other than the American people for decades now.

One of the main reasons for this are the blackmail operations (epstein was just one of many) targeting big players in all 3 branches of govt at all levels as well as big players in the private sector (Gates, Stephen Hawking, Celebs, royalty, etc.) for many decades. Once the epstein thread gets pulled it could potentially collapse entire sections of our govt (imagine if like 1/3 of all Senators were involved). I don't think it's hyperbolic at all to say the list of people caught up in the epstein honeypot/web could be considered a threat to national security. God only know how many Senators, Judges, et al were caught up in this.

Pulling on the thread will also clearly expose that epstein was a joint cia/mossad operation which points back to Israel and thanks to AIPAC most people in DC don't want to go down that road.

You believed in Q, the guy who turned out to be a fraud and a provider of child porn.

You believed Hillary was under double secret arrest, allowed to walk "freely" so as not to spur on riots.

I wonder how wrong you also are about this whole Epstein debacle ...

Shouldn't you be out searching for the fake planes that didn't take down the twin towers, according to you?
 

Dershowitz says he has seen the list, knows why certain people are being protected, but can't release the information, because of attorney client confidentiality. This is not good at all. Dershowitz has generally been very credible with his factual allegations, although his policy positions are often quite biased.
What does "client list" mean? We know he had a lot of clients through his investment firms. Does this mean people he sold kids to or had videos on?
 
You believed in Q, the guy who turned out to be a fraud and a provider of child porn.

You believed Hillary was under double secret arrest, allowed to walk "freely" so as not to spur on riots.

I wonder how wrong you also are about this whole Epstein debacle ...

Shouldn't you be out searching for the fake planes that didn't take down the twin towers, according to you?
Oh look, it's simplyconstipated/PP head. Thanks for outing yourself so I can promptly put you on ignore.

Not surprisingly your whole understanding of Q is way off base. One of the central themes of the posts was that there are pedo/honeypot operations (by people like epstein) who have compromised our govt b/c it's riddled with pedos. The stupid HBO documentary or whatever the fuuck you watched that made you think the person posting as Q was a child porn peddler really did a number on you. Only a smooth brain like yourself would believe a narrative that a pedo/provider of child porn would spend years posting anonymously online to <checks notes> expose the fact that pedos are everywhere and most of our local/fed govts are run by pedos. Brilliant!!

Ironically all the stuff that Q said about honeypots/pedo rings among the rich & famous turned out to be right on the mark (see epstein, NXIVM, Jean-Luc Brunel, Diddy, etc.).....or was that just another crazy conspiracy theory? I seem to remember you constantly harping on the notion of elite pedo rings being a crazy right wing conspiracy theory. With that in mind you should sit the next few plays out and let the adults talk this out

Re: the planes lemme know when you find an explanation for how an unmodified commercial 767 was able to go 510 knots (see flight 175) at sea level without experiencing catastrophic structural failure or being controllable for a professional let alone an armature with ZERO hours in that type of plane.

V-n_diagram_767.jpg

(Boeing 767 V-G diagram showing catastrophic structural failure occurs at 420 knots)

As I said before I have no idea what hit the towers but it sure as fuuck wasn't a commercial airliner flown by amateurs.

Don't take my word for it, check out this interview with a pilot with 20,000 hours who actually captained one of the planes that hit the towers in the past. The pilot in the below interview said the air is so dense at sea level that even the Concord jet wouldn't be able to hit over 500 knots at that altitude.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/HdbEjxFGAGJt
(WORLD TRADE CENTER ATTACK - PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH, On 9/11 The Reported airspeed of United flight 175 was 510 knots near sea level. At 22,000 ft the equivalent speed/stress is 722 knots or mach 1.19)
 
Last edited:
Oh look, it's simplyconstipated/PP head. Thanks for outing yourself so I can promptly put you on ignore.

Not surprisingly your whole understanding of Q is way off base. One of the central themes of the posts was that there are pedo/honeypot operations (by people like epstein) who have compromised our govt b/c it's riddled with pedos. The stupid HBO documentary or whatever the fuuck you watched that made you think the person posting as Q was a child porn peddler really did a number on you. Only a smooth brain like yourself would believe a narrative that a pedo/provider of child porn would spend years posting anonymously online to <checks notes> expose the fact that pedos are everywhere and most of our local/fed govts are run by pedos. Brilliant!!

Ironically all the stuff that Q said about honeypots/pedo rings among the rich & famous turned out to be right on the mark (see epstein, NXIVM, Jean-Luc Brunel, Diddy, etc.).....or was that just another crazy conspiracy theory?

Re: the planes lemme know when you find an explanation for how an unmodified commercial 767 was able to go 510 knots at sea level without breaking apart or being completely uncontrollable for a professional let alone an armature with ZERO hours in that type of plane.

V-n_diagram_767.jpg

(Boeing 767 V-G diagram showing catastrophic structural failure occurs at 420 knots)

As I said before I have no idea what hit the towers but it sure as fuuck wasn't a commercial airliner flown by amateurs.

Thank you, WeRQwazy, for reminding everyone that you're a complete loon whose opinion is driven by mental illness and should be ignored.

It was easy to get you to out yourself as a nut.
 
Thank you, WeRQwazy, for reminding everyone that you're a complete loon whose opinion is driven by mental illness and should be ignored.

It was easy to get you to out yourself as a nut.
Way to ignore all my points/questions. The loons are the ones who think a 767 can go 510 knots at sea level while still intact let alone controllable and there aren't elite pedo rings.

Or do you think elite pedo rings are real now? Which is it?

When you don't have good responses to simple questions you resort to ad hominems, this is the pattern we see with you over and over and over and it's why 99% of the prior board had you on ignore, you're an insufferable *** clown not interested in real convos. Back to ignore you go, enjoy your cognitive dissonance!
 
Back
Top