Lack of mental toughness with his teams which goes to not being a disciplinarian. This all manifested itself in losing close games with poor execution in the clutch.1. He didn't fully grasp the importance of LOS dominance.
2. He wasn't an Xs & Os scheming/gaming guy.
3. He threw darts when hiring OCs.
4. Large inconguence between QB styles and offensive schemes.
5. Pensonality-wise, he was salesman and was defensive.
6. For being an explosive play guy, why ignore the WR room?
7. Not sure about his relationship with the troops or what style motivated them, but the post-tackle dancing and the personal fouls indicated to me that he was not a disciplinarian.
I agree with your points. From what I see, I think favoritism is also an issue.1. He didn't fully grasp the importance of LOS dominance.
2. He wasn't an Xs & Os scheming/gaming guy.
3. He threw darts when hiring OCs.
4. Large inconguence between QB styles and offensive schemes.
5. Pensonality-wise, he was salesman and was defensive.
6. For being an explosive play guy, why ignore the WR room?
7. Not sure about his relationship with the troops or what style motivated them, but the post-tackle dancing and the personal fouls indicated to me that he was not a disciplinarian.
I think he stuck with players like Singleton out of a sense of loyalty. Singleton was the go to RB when we needed 2 yds for a 1st down in all 3 losses.I agree with your points. From what I see, I think favoritism is also an issue.
I think any HC needs some type of unbiased board that can provide weekly input. Not strict, binding info, but maybe Franklin's cognitive and personality shortcomings, as found with any leader or even human, didn't allow him to see some critical things. To me, post-tackle dancers may not be leaders, or maybe teams see that if they shut down Tyler Warren, then PSU won't be prepared for it. A great head coach should always be aware of his own blind spots and be receptive to input. IMHO.1. He didn't fully grasp the importance of LOS dominance.
2. He wasn't an Xs & Os scheming/gaming guy.
3. He threw darts when hiring OCs.
4. Large inconguence between QB styles and offensive schemes.
5. Pensonality-wise, he was salesman and was defensive.
6. For being an explosive play guy, why ignore the WR room?
7. Not sure about his relationship with the troops or what style motivated them, but the post-tackle dancing and the personal fouls indicated to me that he was not a disciplinarian.
His game management was mind numbingly stupid. The end of the first half at UCLA is a great example.1. He didn't fully grasp the importance of LOS dominance.
2. He wasn't an Xs & Os scheming/gaming guy.
3. He threw darts when hiring OCs.
4. Large inconguence between QB styles and offensive schemes.
5. Pensonality-wise, he was salesman and was defensive.
6. For being an explosive play guy, why ignore the WR room?
7. Not sure about his relationship with the troops or what style motivated them, but the post-tackle dancing and the personal fouls indicated to me that he was not a disciplinarian.