LionDeNittany
Well-known member
I did, actually. In the first half, Penn State only had THREE possessions. The first was a long drive for a TD. The second was stopped when a WR dropped a ball that hit him right in the chest (Gary Danielson blamed that on Alllar, go figure). The third stopped on downs with around :30 to go in the half.
So the PSU drives went like this: zero (onside kick), ten plays 75 yards for a TD, 3 plays for 4 yards, and eight plays for 28 yards.
UCLA had drives of 10/75/TD, 7/40/FG (onside kick), 17/75(TD), 6/68 (TD), and 3/17 (FG).
To recap, and If you do the math, PSU only had 21 plays in the first half to UCLA's 43. This is most due to a) allowing drives of 75, 40, 75, 68, and 17 and b) a horrible onside kick turnover.
![]()
Yes. So psu not having more than 21 plays... that was on the offense.
I'm not even going to start on the defense. They were putrid.
The DC kept blitzing from the safety and LB spot, leaving the middle open for long runs.
At some point he should have stopped and just played a base defense, forcing the UCLA qb to throw the ball.
I'd take it a step further. Rush three. Because the blitz was killing us.