Respectfully, I think you are missing the bigger underlying driver. It not about a blind "hatred of ND." Did the committee appear to make a head-scratching reordering? Yes. But let's be real. Usually ND gets the benefit of these decisions made for "pure politics." Everyone "gloating" is simply acknowledging the "make-up cal"l of ND getting a taste of its own medicine for once. And how did they respond? They threw a **** temper tantrum like a bunch of entitled babies. Are you F###ing kidding me?
There is also the fact that ND's resume is hot garbage. You can spin some sort SOS argument any way you want, but you understand the relative quality of who they played and how they performed. For example, beating a bunch of 30th percentile teams is no different than beating a bunch of 40th percentile teams when you are a Top 15 team. Alabama wasn't great. Miami wasn't great. But neither was ND. Arguing over who is 9th place is stupid. I thought expanding to 12 would lessen any real bitching b/c it would include teams with no real chance to win. This ND hissy fit makes me want to shrink the playoff field. "You lost 2 games and beat nobody. SHUT UP and enjoy the Buccee's hot mess carquest bowl sponsored by Tostitos."
This isn't about "hatred of ND." It's enjoying watching a bunch of entitled D-bags having the shoe on the other foot ONE F###ing time and seeing them throw a temper tantrum like the spoiled toddlers they are. Everyone enjoys a little karma. Everyone enjoys a little karma on ND a little more because they are a whole lot more deserving of it.
Well far be it from me to begrudge anyone their Notre Dame hate. I mean, I "hate" Ohio State, Michigan, and the SEC, so who am I to object to others "hating" Notre Dame. (It's a given that when we talk about "hate" in this context, we're using the word figuratively...like saying I hate liver or something along those lines.)
That said, I think you're behind the times with your "pure politics" equation. There was a time when Notre Dame benefited big-time from the politics of college football. That time was long ago. Now it's more likely that Notre Dame falls on the wrong side of the sport's politics for the simple reason that there's a powerful media contingent that hates Notre Dame as well as a powerful alliance of networks and conferences whose interests oppose Notre Dame's.
This is not new in fact. Go back, for example, to 1993 when Notre Dame finished 2nd to Florida State in the final polls despite soundly beating the Seminoles, supposedly one of the teams of the century, only a few weeks earlier. This after Notre Dame finished 2nd to Miami in 1989 and the media argument then was, well, Miami beat Notre Dame head-to-head. End of discussion. A few years later, suddenly that metric didn't count.
That's why I commented earlier in this thread that things like head-to-head or the eye test or whatever other bullshite the media wants to blather about only seem to make the difference when it's politically convenient and suits the desired political end result, factors which change from year to year.
I'm actually no great fan of Notre Dame but as a fan of college football I would have liked to see them make the playoff field this year for the potentially great matchups that would have happened. I mean, everyone knows that Notre Dame is one of the five best teams in the country at this point in time. Even Notre Dame haters in the media generally admit to that. Vegas had them as the 4th most likely team to win the whole thing. The idea they get left out at the last minute for reasons of politics while Tulane and James Madison get served up as ritual sacrifices in the first round is laughable.
You pooh-pooh the schedule matrix of ESPN, FPI, Sagarin and so forth, but those lists are based on metrics. There is no bias built into them, unlike there is in the arguments of commentators and fans. And the metrics show that the schedule knock on Notre Dame doesn't hold up.
No disrespect intended to your point of view and certainly no offense taken. I'm a fan of a team, Penn State, that's been screwed over so many times in so many ways over so many years for reasons that have boiled down to politics. So that's a sore spot in general with me. If the talking heads had the integrity to look us in the eye and say, look, yes, we had to do a last-minute reordering of the rankings to accommodate Alabama, the SEC, the ACC, and ESPN, I could at least respect their honesty. But instead they insult my intelligence by peeing on my leg and saying it's raining.