Pam Bondi Should Be fired

Fine. If they met him at a party or whatever, they can defend that. People understand that Epstein was very connected and invited to events with prominent people who had no idea what he was up to all along.
So you want ~100 prominent people to defend themselves even though there's no evidence that they participated in Epstein's crimes?
 
So you want ~100 prominent people to defend themselves even though there's no evidence that they participated in Epstein's crimes?

Bill O'Reilly and Victor Davis Hanson are both making some version of this point...that the problem is collateral damage to and guilt by association for those who did nothing wrong but whose names may innocently pop up in the "files."

I get that, but the problem is that people like Kash Patel and Dan Bongino...and yes, Trump himself...made a lot of promises and lurid accusations when they were not in charge. And now that they are in charge, it's suddenly: nothing to see here...move along.

People don't like to have their intelligence insulted...and honestly, that's what this sudden reversal from Trump and his subordinates is doing...
 
tl:dr

stop wasting your time with these manifestos. nobody is reading your useless garbage.
I wasted my time with his clown for about 10 before I finally put him on ignore. In all those years, he didn't have one post that had any meaningful substance. You and others here would be far ahead by putting him on ignore.
 
Are you OK with our allies taking advantage of us?

I don't think he keeps changing his mind. I think he's just playing hardball to get the best deal he can get.
In a general sense, he is always had the same policies towards tariffs. He has been talking about them since the 1980s. They are very complicated subject that Trump tries to simplify too much and uses a heavy hand. On the other hand, they are politically popular.
 
Are you OK with our allies taking advantage of us?

I don't think he keeps changing his mind. I think he's just playing hardball to get the best deal he can get.
I don't agree that we are be taken advantage. Wimp, crybaby Trump doesn't understand that if we pay a foreign company for product, we receive the product. Nothing unfair about that. What Trump is doing is taking away choice from consumers. It seems MAGA does not care anymore about the free market.
 
I don't agree that we are be taken advantage. Wimp, crybaby Trump doesn't understand that if we pay a foreign company for product, we receive the product. Nothing unfair about that. What Trump is doing is taking away choice from consumers. It seems MAGA does not care anymore about the free market.

I think we need more gubmint spending on NASA. You know, the multiplier effect.
 
In a general sense, he is always had the same policies towards tariffs. He has been talking about them since the 1980s. They are very complicated subject that Trump tries to simplify too much and uses a heavy hand. On the other hand, they are politically popular.
Let's use Canada as an example. I really want them to be our biggest ally but that doesn't mean we should allow ourselves to be taken advantage of. The USA spends 3.4% of GDP on defense. Canada spends less than 1.4%. That's totally B.S. Why should we even defend them? Same with tariffs. Why should we pay the most? I don’t like some of Trump's tactics but I also don't like buying friends. I think the only way to reset some things is by playing hardball.
 
The multiplier effect works better with more middle-class jobs. NASA probably has more higher paying jobs. NASA robs the private sector of needed engineers and scientists.
500px-NASA-Budget-Federal.svg.png

600px-NASA_dollars.jpg
 
The multiplier effect works better with more middle-class jobs. NASA probably has more higher paying jobs. NASA robs the private sector of needed engineers and scientists.

The multiplier effect works better with those that can multiply MORE.....

How well are you getting along on On3?
 
Back
Top