Pam Bondi Should Be fired

My biggest issue is they knew from Day 1 they couldn't release the list since it'd implicate way too many people (criminally or at least by association, ie, like the PSU BOT during the Sandusky scandal), but used it as a campaign lure (when they really didn't need to).

Otherwise nothing good will come from releasing that list, Democrat or Republican.
 
My biggest issue is they knew from Day 1 they couldn't release the list since it'd implicate way too many people (criminally or at least by association, ie, like the PSU BOT during the Sandusky scandal), but used it as a campaign lure (when they really didn't need to).

Otherwise nothing good will come from releasing that list, Democrat or Republican.
Yeah, let's just keep potentially government-funded rape of minors under wraps because some "important" people may be exposed by their association with Epstein and have to defend it. This is how the people lose complete faith in their government.
 
My biggest issue is they knew from Day 1 they couldn't release the list since it'd implicate way too many people (criminally or at least by association, ie, like the PSU BOT during the Sandusky scandal), but used it as a campaign lure (when they really didn't need to).

Otherwise nothing good will come from releasing that list, Democrat or Republican.

 
Yeah, let's just keep potentially government-funded rape of minors under wraps because some "important" people may be exposed by their association with Epstein and have to defend it. This is how the people lose complete faith in their government.
You're not wrong. Just which is the lessor of two evils I guess.

But anyway, Trump better be serious this time

 
My biggest issue is they knew from Day 1 they couldn't release the list since it'd implicate way too many people (criminally or at least by association, ie, like the PSU BOT during the Sandusky scandal), but used it as a campaign lure (when they really didn't need to).

Otherwise nothing good will come from releasing that list, Democrat or Republican.
Why would this be a big issue for you? He admitted, after being elected the first time, that the "Lock Her Up!" nonsense that got all his followers so lathered up, was just nonsense to pull one over on you guys. And you were like "yeah, give us more!" And you fell for the Epstein list nonsense ... especially when he's a proven sexual predators who is highly likely to be implicated, if there was a list?
 
Why would this be a big issue for you? He admitted, after being elected the first time, that the "Lock Her Up!" nonsense that got all his followers so lathered up, was just nonsense to pull one over on you guys. And you were like "yeah, give us more!" And you fell for the Epstein list nonsense ... especially when he's a proven sexual predators who is highly likely to be implicated, if there was a list?

You mean he WASN'T really going to lock Hillary up? ****! lol....
 
The multiplier effect works better with more middle-class jobs. NASA probably has more higher paying jobs. NASA robs the private sector of needed engineers and scientists.

You know what's a great multiplier? $10+T in foreign investment. That buys a lot of high paying middle class jobs. What prompted all this investment? Tariffs.

As far as consumers go, you know what Japanese automakers did? They lowered the prices of their cars to offset the tariffs. So, basically a lot of the revenue the car makers would get goes to lower the US Treasury. Multiplier.

In Vietnam, they agreed to eliminate all their tariffs even the US still had tariffs. That's a population of 100,000,000 that US automakers can sell to, and at lower tariff rates than other countries. Multiplier.
 
You know what's a great multiplier? $10+T in foreign investment. That buys a lot of high paying middle class jobs. What prompted all this investment? Tariffs.

As far as consumers go, you know what Japanese automakers did? They lowered the prices of their cars to offset the tariffs. So, basically a lot of the revenue the car makers would get goes to lower the US Treasury. Multiplier.

In Vietnam, they agreed to eliminate all their tariffs even the US still had tariffs. That's a population of 100,000,000 that US automakers can sell to, and at lower tariff rates than other countries. Multiplier.

You know what's a great multiplier? $10+T in foreign investment. That buys a lot of high paying middle class jobs. What prompted all this investment? Tariffs.

As far as consumers go, you know what Japanese automakers did? They lowered the prices of their cars to offset the tariffs. So, basically a lot of the revenue the car makers would get goes to lower the US Treasury. Multiplier.

In Vietnam, they agreed to eliminate all their tariffs even the US still had tariffs. That's a population of 100,000,000 that US automakers can sell to, and at lower tariff rates than other countries. Multiplier.
Where is your data for $10 trillion in foreign investment in the U.S.?
 
These are Trump people. They'd have no reason to cover something up, unless it was to protect Trump or at Trump's direction. Trump has come out and publicly supported Bondi and, basically, scolded people for worrying about this whole Epstein thing. There is no rational way to scapegoat Bondi, without implicating Trump.



On February 21st, she was interviewed, and she was asked a question: "The DOJ may be releasing the list of Jeffrey Epstein's clients? Will that really happen?" and she responded (verbatim) "It's sitting on my desk right now to review ... that's been a directive by President Trump ... I'm reviewing that ... I'm reviewing JFK files, MLK files ... that's all in the process of being reviewed because that was done at the directive of the President from all of these agencies ..."

On February 27th, she sent a letter to FBI Director Patel saying (paraphrased, for brevity) ... "hey, I asked for all the files related to Epstein before you took office and I got 200 pages of docs in response ... flight logs, Epstein's list of contacts, a list of victims names and numbers. I kept asking if this was everything and the FBI told me it was ... then someone in the NY Field Office told me there were thousands pages more, and the FBI never disclosed these. When I talked to you about it, you seemed as shocked as I was ... so now I want all those pages delivered to me by tomorrow."

Full letter here:


From this you can fairly deduce the following ... she was after all the information, and wasn't bullshitting, or she was putting up a great front. Folks interpreted her Feb 21st comments as saying she had an actual Epstein list, but you can tell by her comments, when she followed up the "It's sitting on my desk right now" comment referring to JFK and MLK files, that she kinda short-handed the answer and was referring to a clump of files ... a clump she hadn't gone through yet. So she wouldn't have known if she had a specific "list," and didn't meant to convey that she had "THE list." She had Epstein, JFK and MLK files sitting on her desk waiting for review.

So, between the 21st and 27th, she was told there's a crap ton more files and she demanded these. If this was some cover-up/fake, why would she do this? These were covered up files that could have easily remained covered up.

Then she reviews all the files, and they come up with their joint FBI/DOJ memo saying we're not releasing anything further. There's no smoking gun Epstein client list, Epstein committed suicide ... the end.

So, either there's actually nothing here, or Trump is directing the cover-up.
Thought I'd post the letter since most on this board fear you're a lunatic and would link an address with a virus.
I saw this posted on the David Pakman earlier.
Thanks


1752795322699.png
 
Back
Top