None of the examples you cited are remotely on par with or equivalent to the sentiments expressed by your friends to the effect that Texas and Texans "deserved" the suffering and death that the catastrophic flooding inflicted on them.
If you read the material you posted with a focus on English comprehension, I'm sure a smart boy like you would be able to pick out the difference between taking clear delight in the pain of people whose only crime is their voting preference (as in Texas on the one hand) and blaming the governing authorities for reckless policy decisions that helped set the stage for a disaster (as in California on the other hand).
Nobody in the links you posted made the statement that the people of California "deserved" the suffering that the fires inflicted on them. Just the opposite in fact.
Also, saying that both situations are tragic and none of the victims deserved what happened to them is a good start, but it was NOT the same as an outright condemnation of those who clearly took pleasure in the catastrophe that befell the Texas victims.
However, it's nice that now, when prodded, you offer a "clear condemnation" of your disgusting partisan allies. I would be happy to condemn anybody on my side of the divide who expressed similar sentiments about the California fires, but you provided no equivalent examples.
I'm sorry, I know it sucks to have so many rotten specimens of humanity on your political side, but you should ask yourself what it is about your Party that attracts such vermin.