Two blockbuster summer movies to avoid

IA, do you see what you're dealing with here? This is a disturbed individual with a long history of bans and suspensions...and it's not hard to understand why. Just read the post above.

Now he throws one of his trademark tantrums and plays the victim card at the thought you may not indulge his sick obsession with Matt (and me), which is stoked by rabid lies and distortions concocted in his twisted mind.

The record will show that I put a post up on the subject of a couple movies. This person then slimed the thread because that's what he does. I mean, it's unfortunate. You did us the service of creating this board...and this is what you get.
Agreed. There are also other posters in other sections of this board that also go full ad hominem, adding no intellectual or researched counter argument. It ruins the experience of a "free-for-all" board.
If tariffs, for example, happen to bring in a lot of treasury revenue and cause companies to shift manufacturing and jobs to the US, then we "Trumpers" are blind sycophants by agreeing to it. There's no counter arguments to the tariffs. It's relentless and will destroy this board. And it's a small percentage of people who do this on all social media. They just invade and destroy.
 
Poor PeePee the multiple bans disbarred Whale shark of the small mind no one cares what he says... classic breakdown time for him.

I just saw the clip he posted... says nothing like PeePee claims it does.
You're being disingenuous, at best.

He's argued that adolescence - that is, the ages generally between 10-19 - is a modern day plague, like crack-cocaine and chemical warfare.

Do you agree that this means he wants to do away with adolescence, and, therefore, treat those as young as 10 as adults? If not, explain your reasoning based on what he's actually said.

So, reasonable, logical people understand he desires adolescence to be "abolished."

Then he argues that, if we treat 13 year olds as 23 year olds, as they were, allegedly, in the past ... and successfully, according to him ... that they'll be fine.

So, now we have a guy saying "hey, treating 10-19 year olds is a modern day plague, and if we treat 13 year olds as 23 year olds, they'll be just fine."

In case you weren't aware, 23 year olds, in today's American society, can vote, have sex with whoever they want, marry, have full-time jobs ... you know, basically do whatever.

Then you add in that he's saying that teenage pregnancy isn't the problem - it's UNWED teenage pregnancy. He's also making sure we know that women are at their most fertile before they're considered adults in today's society.

To any reasonable person, he's advocating for young teenagers to be married off, impregnated, and sent off to work.

We also know, based on his other ramblings throughout his "career" that he's big on "men work, women in the kitchen popping out kids" ... so he's advocating for young teenage girls to be married off and impregnated, forced to live a subservient life.

Now, I understand why you rush to his defense - you've argued that we should be employing/exploiting underage children to work in family businesses, so you're at least generally on board with this reduction in the age of "responsibility" from what modern-day society would advocate.

But that doesn't change what he's said.
 
Last edited:
You put a post up on the subject of promoting your son's movies, under the guise of attacking, in a ridiculous and hateful manner, two other movies currently in theaters based on your far right extremist political views.

I addressed the subject of your promotion.

You cried because your promotion failed.
You are cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs
 
You're being disingenuous, at best.

He's argued that adolescence - that is, the ages generally between 10-19 - is a modern day plague, like crack-cocaine and chemical warfare.

Do you agree that this means he wants to do away with adolescence, and, therefore, treat those as young as 10 as adults? If not, explain your reasoning based on what he's actually said.

So, reasonable, logical people understand he desires adolescence to be "abolished."

Then he argues that, if we treat 13 year olds as 23 year olds, as they were, allegedly, in the past ... and successfully, according to him ... that they'll be fine.

So, now we have a guy saying "hey, treating 10-19 year olds is a modern day plague, and if we treat 13 year olds as 23 year olds, they'll be just fine."

In case you weren't aware, 23 year olds, in today's American society, can vote, have sex with whoever they want, marry, have full-time jobs ... you know, basically do whatever.

Then you add in that he's saying that teenage pregnancy isn't the problem - it's UNWED teenage pregnancy. He's also making sure we know that women are at their most fertile before they're considered adults in today's society.

To any reasonable person, he's advocating for young teenagers to be married off, impregnated, and sent off to work.

We also know, based on his other ramblings throughout his "career" that he's big on "men work, women in the kitchen popping out kids" ... so he's advocating for young teenage girls to be married off and impregnated, forced to live a subservient life.

Now, I understand why you rush to his defense - you've argued that we should be employing/exploiting underage children to work in family businesses, so you're at least generally on board with this reduction in the age of "responsibility" from what modern-day society would advocate.

But that doesn't change what he's said.

Sorry don't have time for your nonsensical rants right now.
 
Ignore is your friend. Multiple conservatives have called out Trump on various issues and his strategy. We have yet to see that from a single poster on the left. There is no speaking to these people at all.
You've done nothing but cast hateful aspersions at me, and the only other non-Trumper poster who was at all active here posted completely on topic, without anything hateful pointed at any one person, and he was met by this, from you - this is 3 posts in a row, with no response from Steve G in between:

More lies and bullsh&t from you. You probably need a puppy as well. Such a beta male. Lmao. You're nothing but a psychopath at this stage with your lies. Aren't you a shrink? Or, do you live amongst shrinks? Lol
Show us real, verified sources of all rhe Americans being picked up by ICE. What a little beta male you are. Waaaaaaaaa!
Hey you pathetic fool. Where are all the children Biden lost? Answer the question you gutless wonder.

It's clear that you're one of the ones that can't be spoken to ... you'll just flame out, meltdown and never address or rectify your crazy behavior.
 
You've done nothing but cast hateful aspersions at me, and the only other non-Trumper poster who was at all active here posted completely on topic, without anything hateful pointed at any one person, and he was met by this, from you - this is 3 posts in a row, with no response from Steve G in between:





It's clear that you're one of the ones that can't be spoken to ... you'll just flame out, meltdown and never address or rectify your crazy behavior.

PeePee the multiple bans disbarred Whale shark of the small mind... crying.
 
Poor PeePee the multiple bans disbarred Whale shark of the small mind no one cares what he says... classic breakdown time for him.

I just saw the clip he posted... says nothing like PeePee claims it does.

Agreed.

Here's the reality: a few years ago Matt was scoring big-time in his battle against the Wokeist and Dem-Mediacrat ghouls who have made the sexual mutilation of children one of their sacred causes in much the same way that the sacrifice of children to the god Moloch was sacred to certain pagan civilizations in a bygone era.

So today's proponents of the modern version of that same bygone child abuse, enraged at Matt's success in depriving them of victims, let loose their dogs on him with instructions to comb through every word that he's ever said or written since he got into the media business at a small Delaware radio station at the age of 21. And for all their trouble and all the time they spent on the project, examining tens of thousands of Matt's comments, either written or spoken, they managed to come up with the grand total of one riff from a radio morning show on the concept of "adolescence" being a modern-day invention...as previous generations back through time did not have the luxury.

They then chopped and distorted this comment to produce the fantastic lie that Matt is a closet pedophile who favors "impregnating 13-year olds." That's what they went with. That was the glorious scoop intended to end Matt's career. In fact, it was so thin and so lame and so grotesquely false that even some of the Usual Suspects on the Left wouldn't touch it, leaving only the most rabid nutjobs to carry the torch.

And here's where the story really gets good. Matt did a response titled Kiss My ***, which went viral...and not long thereafter the whole thing blew up in the faces of those who hatched the tale. It did not damage Matt. On the contrary, he picked up 200,000 Twitter followers in the space of a couple weeks. Then, as icing on the cake, Vanderbilt announced just days later that it was shutting down its program of "gender-affirming care" which Matt Matt had exposed on his show a few months earlier.

Tennessee then enacted a law -- Matt testified at the legislative hearing -- banning the practice in the state. This is the very law that the Supreme Court affirmed in a landmark ruling a few weeks ago. One lone guy was instrumental in bringing all this about, and that guy was Matt Walsh. Needless to say, this has only fueled the rage of the world's Cuckoo Birds.

Since then, Matt has made two record-breaking movies. He's closing in on 4 million Twitter followers. He was named by the New York Times as one of the nation's most influential conservative commentators. His daily show is one of the most popular in conservative media. None of this could have happened...or would have been possible...if there had been even an ounce of truth to any of the lurid accusations that are now pretty much the province of a band of ranting Internet losers like Cuckoo Bird.

In other words, their little smear job boomeranged and did the exact opposite of what they intended. Thank you, God. So I'll put whatever-his-screen-name-is-this-time back on Ignore and let him keep spewing to his heart's content. It's not hurting Matt in the least. It's only confirming Cuckoo Bird's status as a wackjob, which anyone paying attention already knew. That said, his whiny little tantrum about one of his precious posts being deleted was entertaining as hell. I'm glad I didn't have him on Ignore for that one.
 
Agreed.

Here's the reality: a few years ago Matt was scoring big-time in his battle against the Wokeist and Dem-Mediacrat ghouls who have made the sexual mutilation of children one of their sacred causes in much the same way that the sacrifice of children to the god Moloch was sacred to certain pagan civilizations in a bygone era.

So today's proponents of the modern version of that same bygone child abuse, enraged at Matt's success in depriving them of victims, let loose their dogs on him with instructions to comb through every word that he's ever said or written since he got into the media business at a small Delaware radio station at the age of 21. And for all their trouble and all the time they spent on the project, examining tens of thousands of Matt's comments, either written or spoken, they managed to come up with the grand total of one riff from a radio morning show on the concept of "adolescence" being a modern-day invention...as previous generations back through time did not have the luxury.

They then chopped and distorted this comment to produce the fantastic lie that Matt is a closet pedophile who favors "impregnating 13-year olds." That's what they went with. That was the glorious scoop intended to end Matt's career. In fact, it was so thin and so lame and so grotesquely false that even some of the Usual Suspects on the Left wouldn't touch it, leaving only the most rabid nutjobs to carry the torch.

And here's where the story really gets good. Matt did a response titled Kiss My ***, which went viral...and not long thereafter the whole thing blew up in the faces of those who hatched the tale. It did not damage Matt. On the contrary, he picked up 200,000 Twitter followers in the space of a couple weeks. Then, as icing on the cake, Vanderbilt announced just days later that it was shutting down its program of "gender-affirming care" which Matt Matt had exposed on his show a few months earlier.

Tennessee then enacted a law -- Matt testified at the legislative hearing -- banning the practice in the state. This is the very law that the Supreme Court affirmed in a landmark ruling a few weeks ago. One lone guy was instrumental in bringing all this about, and that guy was Matt Walsh. Needless to say, this has only fueled the rage of the world's Cuckoo Birds.

Since then, Matt has made two record-breaking movies. He's closing in on 4 million Twitter followers. He was named by the New York Times as one of the nation's most influential conservative commentators. His daily show is one of the most popular in conservative media. None of this could have happened...or would have been possible...if there had been even an ounce of truth to any of the lurid accusations that are now pretty much the province of a band of ranting Internet losers like Cuckoo Bird.

In other words, their little smear job boomeranged and did the exact opposite of what they intended. Thank you, God. So I'll put whatever-his-screen-name-is-this-time back on Ignore and let him keep spewing to his heart's content. It's not hurting Matt in the least. It's only confirming Cuckoo Bird's status as a wackjob, which anyone paying attention already knew. That said, his whiny little tantrum about one of his precious posts being deleted was entertaining as hell. I'm glad I didn't have him on Ignore for that one.

Just watching the clip, which i had never heard, it was amazing how much PeePee the multiple bans disbarred Whale shark of the small mind tried to distort what Matt was saying.

As you know, I don't always agree with what Matt says. But I'm sure he is OK with that. As am I.

But twisting what someone says is perverted... like PeePee the multiple bans disbarred Whale shark of the small mind.
 
Agreed.

Here's the reality: a few years ago Matt was scoring big-time in his battle against the Wokeist and Dem-Mediacrat ghouls who have made the sexual mutilation of children one of their sacred causes in much the same way that the sacrifice of children to the god Moloch was sacred to certain pagan civilizations in a bygone era.

You seem sane.

You don't have to be a proponent of "the sexual mutiliation of children" to read/hear exactly what Matt Walsh was advocating for here.

I have no desire to promote any surgeries or hormones being given to folks who aren't of the age of majority to adjust their gender in any way shape or form - this is something that folks like you have to try to attach to the opposition to disparage them.

There's no chopping or distorting of the comments needed.

He clearly called adolescence a modern day plague. It was the title of his blog post. He, thereafter, argued for eradication of this "plague" (i.e. he wants to treat 10-19 year olds as adults).

He clearly wrote that 13 year olds of the past were treated like today's 23 year olds, and they could handle it if they were treated as such today.

He clearly stated that the problem of today wasn't teenage pregnancy - it was unwed teenage pregnancy.

And he clearly stated that girls were most fertile before the age of majority.

So he clearly advocated for the marrying off and impregnation of girls under the age of majority ... at least until the age of 13, if not younger. And, of course, he's still promoting the barefoot and pregnant subservient wife.

Even the Babylon Bee, who usually only targets non-Trumpers and non-cons, took note of how backward and abusive he is ...


"At publishing time, the team had disbanded after Walsh asked all of the swimmers to quit in order to better pursue marriage and motherhood."
 
You seem sane.

You don't have to be a proponent of "the sexual mutiliation of children" to read/hear exactly what Matt Walsh was advocating for here.

I have no desire to promote any surgeries or hormones being given to folks who aren't of the age of majority to adjust their gender in any way shape or form - this is something that folks like you have to try to attach to the opposition to disparage them.

There's no chopping or distorting of the comments needed.

He clearly called adolescence a modern day plague. It was the title of his blog post. He, thereafter, argued for eradication of this "plague" (i.e. he wants to treat 10-19 year olds as adults).

He clearly wrote that 13 year olds of the past were treated like today's 23 year olds, and they could handle it if they were treated as such today.

He clearly stated that the problem of today wasn't teenage pregnancy - it was unwed teenage pregnancy.

And he clearly stated that girls were most fertile before the age of majority.

So he clearly advocated for the marrying off and impregnation of girls under the age of majority ... at least until the age of 13, if not younger. And, of course, he's still promoting the barefoot and pregnant subservient wife.

Even the Babylon Bee, who usually only targets non-Trumpers and non-cons, took note of how backward and abusive he is ...


"At publishing time, the team had disbanded after Walsh asked all of the swimmers to quit in order to better pursue marriage and motherhood."

LOL
 
Just watching the clip, which i had never heard, it was amazing how much PeePee the multiple bans disbarred Whale shark of the small mind tried to distort what Matt was saying.

As you know, I don't always agree with what Matt says. But I'm sure he is OK with that. As am I.

But twisting what someone says is perverted... like PeePee the multiple bans disbarred Whale shark of the small mind.

Agreed and understood. Nobody agrees with another person all the time. Hell, I don't agree with Matt on occasion.

But there's disagreeing or expressing a difference of view, even forcefully...and then there's just making stuff up and wildly smearing people. Big difference.

Cuckoo Bird is a wackjob and a loser. I'm pretty sure he's never won at anything in his life. So he takes refuge in the Internet anonymity of sicko lies and spew. It's a familiar and very common syndrome.

When the new board was formed and Cuckoo Bird showed up with yet another screen name, I said he was not capable of maintaining the pretense of rationality for more than a handful of posts. It turns out that I overestimated his capability in that department.
 
Agreed and understood. Nobody agrees with another person all the time. Hell, I don't agree with Matt on occasion.

But there's disagreeing or expressing a difference of view, even forcefully...and then there's just making stuff up and wildly smearing people. Big difference.

Cuckoo Bird is a wackjob and a loser. I'm pretty sure he's never won at anything in his life. So he takes refuge in the Internet anonymity of sicko lies and spew. It's a familiar and very common syndrome.

When the new board was formed and Cuckoo Bird showed up with yet another screen name, I said he was not capable of maintaining the pretense of rationality for more than a handful of posts. It turns out that I overestimated his capability in that department.

The entirety of your rhetoric is based on your belief that the Dems are demons, and will destroy western civilization, if not the world. You say all sorts of over the top nonsense about Dems, libs, and anyone who doesn't agree with you, fundamentally. Fire and brimstone, end of days nonsense.

You were a lifelong government employee who wants to overthrow the government and institute a theocracy in its place, ridding the nation of half the people in the process. That's how extreme you are.

The only lies being told here are by you, with regard to your beliefs and your son's beliefs ... and that you were going to leave the board and never come back. And then you came back.
 
Agreed and understood. Nobody agrees with another person all the time. Hell, I don't agree with Matt on occasion.

But there's disagreeing or expressing a difference of view, even forcefully...and then there's just making stuff up and wildly smearing people. Big difference.

Cuckoo Bird is a wackjob and a loser. I'm pretty sure he's never won at anything in his life. So he takes refuge in the Internet anonymity of sicko lies and spew. It's a familiar and very common syndrome.

When the new board was formed and Cuckoo Bird showed up with yet another screen name, I said he was not capable of maintaining the pretense of rationality for more than a handful of posts. It turns out that I overestimated his capability in that department.

PeePee the multiple bans disbarred Whale shark of the small mind is melting down on this board. Quickly.
 
The entirety of your rhetoric is based on your belief that the Dems are demons, and will destroy western civilization, if not the world. You say all sorts of over the top nonsense about Dems, libs, and anyone who doesn't agree with you, fundamentally. Fire and brimstone, end of days nonsense.

You were a lifelong government employee who wants to overthrow the government and institute a theocracy in its place, ridding the nation of half the people in the process. That's how extreme you are.

The only lies being told here are by you, with regard to your beliefs and your son's beliefs ... and that you were going to leave the board and never come back. And then you came back.

Oh you poor thing. Your meltdown is quite a show.
 
Thank you for deleting the post in question which was disturbed and slanderous even by the standards of the individual who authored it.

You've done us all a great service in creating this board and the least we can do is not create problems for you in policing it.

As for Matt, he's a public figure on a public platform and as such is fair game for public criticism and opposition, whether on message boards, college campuses, or anywhere else. But there are lines of fairness and decency that should not be crossed.

Those crossing them have neither the intellectual ability nor the integrity to actually engage on issues so they default to tantrums, threats, lies, slander...and violence. That's not a healthy thing for a democracy, which is why our democracy is none too healthy in the Year of Our Lord 2025.
Another spot on post, as evidenced by KLs laugh reaction.
 
PeePee the multiple bans disbarred Whale shark of the small mind is melting down on this board. Quickly.

Haha! I can imagine. In fact, I'm almost tempted to take his twisted butt off Ignore to enjoy the spectacle. On second thought...naaaah.

You know the funniest thing of all? The dude thinks I'm passing along his rants to Matt. Like Matt could actually give a fig about what some ranting nobody loser on the Internet thinks about him...or anything.
 
Back
Top