LionDeNittany
Well-known member
It looks like Matt Campbell. Done deal.
That's what I am hearing. Great hire
It looks like Matt Campbell. Done deal.
Hopefully this is not just another coach trying to get paidIf Campbell is the next man up, then let's hope that there's no hog butchering tycoon who's ready to ante up $5m to keep him in Ames.
From what I gleaned from TOS, Campbell has a better record against top 25 teams than Kiffen. FWIW.
I have wanted him since James was fired. I think he'll do well if it happens.Matt Campbell??!!
There are rumors afoot.
He's at least a lot better option than Brian Daboli
I don’t think that comparison holds up. Iowa State doesn’t have anywhere near the history or resources Pitt has, so the records aren’t really the same thing. Campbell built them into a steady program from basically nothing. You put him at a place with PSU’s roster, NIL, facilities and support and the ceiling is a whole lot higher than what he could do in Ames. Pitt and Iowa State aren’t the same type of job, not even close.Matt Campbell record 72-55
Pat Narduzzi 80-60
Franklin will probably be in the playoffs next year, with the talent that was already there, plus all the top talent at PSU that will portal there.
Your fascination with Terry is interesting.Just like Cignetti went to that powerhouse Indiana lol.
Not giving Terry a chance ,he won’t have the players ,or the support to win. IMO
Hopefully I’m wrong
The hire Terry crowd knows in their heart that Terry isn't yet qualified to take any power 4 job. I actually think the rest of the conference and the media was rooting for Terry because he isn't prepared and it would send PSU on a downward spiral. The PSU fans who bought into the hire Terry movement are simply being naive. If it ends up being Campbell (it may or may not) then we are infinitely better off. If it ends up being Campbell and we can somehow retain Terry then even better.Your fascination with Terry is interesting.
There is little evidence that Terry would prevent significant portal defections or that he would fare better than someone that is a current P3 head coach.
"100 percent necessitated that Franklin had to be fired" is ludicrous on its face, ironically. They could absolutely have given Franklin the season and then fired at the end. They could have sat him down and talked performance metrics, tried to figure out what was going on with the ugly skid. In other words, they could have considered consequences and acted judiciously! This was a big swing and a miss, filled with big di** energy and implying that coaches and people are entirely expendable when there are championships to win- another ludicrous move based on wildly off-kilter assumptions. Even in the NIL era, football players and coaches are people, not chess pieces to be wielded by the brand, you know, and treatment matters. Dumping Franklin exactly like Nebraska did 16-31 Scott Frost sends a hell of a message and delusion with entitlement chasers is a hell of a drug combo.
You insisting that a 3-game swing, however unfortunate and unexpected, negates what Franklin did is exactly what I'm talking about. Calling me dishonest is exactly what I'm talking about. Kraft swinging a hammer with a big ****eating grin seemingly in the knowledge that a cadre of hardcore fans would defend it- after demanding it- is also what I'm talking about.
Keep equivocating and swinging for the fences about why it "Had to happen" when the results have been outright disastrous. No coaching search has been as dismal, player exodus as brutal and the ex-coach landing on their feet so rapidly, successfully and seemingly backed by a narrative of humanity. Keep griping, carping, moaning and zealously denigrating- oh and definitely talking about 1950- see how it keeps going.
And also in people's minds was his consistent lack of preparedness and execution in those big games. It wasn't just a random thing. Specific failures at critical times meant that Franklin didn't understand important detail for winning those games.You're correct that it wasn't 100% necessary that Franklin had to be fired. But it was at least 99% that he had to be fired before the end of the season. Only the timing of his firing is really debatable.
Franklin was fired for not getting the job done in big games and the "skid", really a "collapse", was just the thing to force PSU to make what was coming anyway a reality.
Everyone should know by now why Franklin was fired. But in case there's any failue to recognize the true reasons, I'll list them here once again:
James Franklin's record against top-25 teams is 15-28, and his record against top-10 teams is 4-21. This is often cited as a significant area of criticism, as his .160 winning percentage against top-10 opponents is the third-worst among coaches with at least 25 such games.
- vs. Top-25 Teams: 15-28
- vs. Top-10 Teams: 4-21
- vs. Top-5 Teams: 1-8
- vs. Michigan and Ohio State: 3-7 against Michigan and 1-10 against Ohio State
His MSU record was successful, in some regards given that it was at MSU and not a real major college football power. But successful is not legendary and backs up the point I was making that Saban didn't do anything special at the college level until he got to the SEC where he oversinged and cut down in the Spring which gave him a MAJOR advantage over every program on a conference that didn't tolerate that "strategy" which was every team not in the SEC. Which is why I believe Saban was not half the coach Paterno was and why I believe many, many very good, not great, coaches could have done similarly at Bama if they had optimized the cheating that Saban did in the same manner he did.I'd say his record at Michigan State was successful. He was then hired by LSU where he won a national championship and compiled a winning percentage of almost 80%. I'd say that's "highly successful."
The point is you can't compare Nick Saban to Brian Daboli. They're not even in the same universe when it comes to college football resumes.